Haberman says Walt Nauta is ‘case study’ of what happens to Trump. Maggie Haberman: Trump indictment is ‘most devastating…that I have ever. Ĭlaims that UFO information was inappropriately withheld from Congress deemed. Sununu blasts 2024 GOP candidates over response to Trump indictmentįormer DHS official: Trump indictment paints ‘vivid picture’ of what. Trump slams Bill Barr as ‘a coward who didn’t do his job’ Surprise Supreme Court decision gives boost to Democratic hopes Senate GOP leaders break with House on Trump indictmentĬonservative revolt in House alarms Senate GOPĭana Bash spars with Jim Jordan over Trump indictmentīarr: Presenting Trump as victim after indictment is ‘ridiculous’Ĭhristie: Details of Trump indictment ‘devastating’ĪT&T, Verizon or T-Mobile? Maps show which cell provider gives your area best. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. “We hired Sarah Jeong because of the exceptional work she has done covering the internet and technology at a range of respected publications,” the Times said. The Times said in a statement at the time that it stood by its decision to hire Jeong and had reviewed the writer’s social media accounts prior to her hiring, while calling the content of the tweets “unacceptable.” “Dumbass f-ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants,” Jeong said in another tweet from that year.Ī third tweet posted by Jeong in 2014 said, “Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins.” “Oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men,” Jeong said in one tweet from 2014 that has since been deleted. Jeong was hired by the Times in August 2018, but the newspaper soon received strong backlash after tweets emerged in which Jeong made racially insensitive comments. But if a reader has real, good-faith objections to certain editorial decisions, the fact that the paper has done great work doesn’t negate those objections,” she added. “A lot of people have done and continue to do great work at the Times. Jeong later told CNN that her tweet was not a “call to unsubscribe,” saying, “I’m just weary of having my name and my work invoked as a reason to not boycott.” What subscribers say can back up dissenting views inside the paper about what it should do and be. It’s one of the metrics for “outrage” that they take to distinguish between “real” outrage and superficial outrage.
NYT does pay attention to subscriber cancellations. What subscribers say can back up dissenting views inside the paper about what it should do and be.” “It’s one of the metrics for ‘outrage’ that they take to distinguish between ‘real’ outrage and superficial outrage. NYT does pay attention to subscriber cancellations,” replied Jeong. It’s not a movement or a boycott,” wrote Guardian columnist Siva Vaidhyanathan, warning that “Even if it did matter it would hurt many great journalists like and wrong. But an individual canceling a subscription does nothing. The news regarding Jeong’s status came hours after she raised eyebrows on Twitter over her response to a columnist for The Guardian who urged against people canceling their subscription to the Times. The Times did not announce Jeong’s departure from its editorial board in August. Jeong is now serving as a “contracted contributor for NYT Opinion,” CNN reported. “But we’re glad to still have her journalism and insights around technology in our pages through her work as a contributor.” “Sarah decided to leave the editorial board in August,” deputy editorial page editor Kate Kingsbury told CNN on Friday. Sarah Jeong is no longer part of The New York Times editorial board, an editor with the newspaper told CNN on Friday, with the writer maintaining that a tweet she sent this week was not a call for people to “unsubscribe” from the paper.
0 kommentar(er)
